<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five steps to reduce the response time of your web page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adil.2scomplement.com/2008/11/how-to-reduce-the-size-of-your-web-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adil.2scomplement.com/2008/11/how-to-reduce-the-size-of-your-web-page/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=how-to-reduce-the-size-of-your-web-page</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:18:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CSS Sprite Tool</title>
		<link>http://adil.2scomplement.com/2008/11/how-to-reduce-the-size-of-your-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-112560</link>
		<dc:creator>CSS Sprite Tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adil.2scomplement.com/?p=72#comment-112560</guid>
		<description>CSS Sprites have been in my experience the quickest win when it comes to improving client loading speeds.  As Javascript becomes more ubiquitous, I think it&#039;s also worth paying extra attention to the size of Javascript files - and the complexity in parsing them.  A minified javascript file may require less bandwidth, but it still requires the same amount of CPU for the browser to parse the code.  Something to keep in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS Sprites have been in my experience the quickest win when it comes to improving client loading speeds.  As Javascript becomes more ubiquitous, I think it&#8217;s also worth paying extra attention to the size of Javascript files &#8211; and the complexity in parsing them.  A minified javascript file may require less bandwidth, but it still requires the same amount of CPU for the browser to parse the code.  Something to keep in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irfan</title>
		<link>http://adil.2scomplement.com/2008/11/how-to-reduce-the-size-of-your-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Irfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adil.2scomplement.com/?p=72#comment-236</guid>
		<description>6- Use CSS sprites (reduced http requests). 
7- Get a CDN or subdomain for static content (no cookies are required for static content + more parallel download connections)
8- Clean up and compress html
9- Use unobtrusive JavaScript
10- Place visible content at the top (CSS) and invisible content at the bottom (JS)
11- Configure Cache-control and expire headers properly
12- Remove ETags of you are not using them (304s are http connection too)

thats all I could remember but their are lots of other steps ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6- Use CSS sprites (reduced http requests).<br />
7- Get a CDN or subdomain for static content (no cookies are required for static content + more parallel download connections)<br />
8- Clean up and compress html<br />
9- Use unobtrusive JavaScript<br />
10- Place visible content at the top (CSS) and invisible content at the bottom (JS)<br />
11- Configure Cache-control and expire headers properly<br />
12- Remove ETags of you are not using them (304s are http connection too)</p>
<p>thats all I could remember but their are lots of other steps &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
